Planet Talk

EVs VS Hybrids: What’s The Better Choice In 2025?

My neighbour Dave spent last weekend bragging about his brand-new hybrid SUV. “Best of both worlds, mate,” he said, proudly patting the bonnet. “Good for the planet and still does 400 miles on a tank.” I smiled politely while thinking the same thing I always do when someone says that: no, Dave, it’s not.

Here’s the truth — in 2025, the better choice for most UK drivers is still a full electric vehicle (EV), not a hybrid. Yes, EVs have their flaws: expensive, limited range for long hauls, and an infrastructure that can still feel like Russian roulette if you’re planning a long motorway trip. But hybrids, especially plug-in ones, have turned into a bit of a con. They promise clean driving but often spend most of their time running on petrol.

EVs aren’t perfect, but they’re a genuine step towards lower emissions. Hybrids are a halfway house that’s overstayed its welcome. In cities like London, Manchester, and Birmingham — where clean air zones and ULEZ charges are expanding — the future is already electric. The question isn’t whether EVs or hybrids are greener. It’s whether we’re ready to be honest about which one actually makes sense.


The Great Green Promise: How We Got Here

For twenty years, carmakers have been promising us a cleaner, greener way to drive. It all started with the Prius.

From Prius Pride to Tesla Fever

Back in the mid-2000s, driving a Toyota Prius was like wearing a badge of moral superiority. Celebrities loved it, politicians endorsed it, and anyone with an eco-streak wanted one. Then Tesla arrived and changed the game. Suddenly, sustainability wasn’t about compromise — it was about power, luxury, and silence on the road.

Tesla turned electric driving into something aspirational, and every major car brand scrambled to catch up. Fast forward to 2025, and EVs make up around 22% of all new cars sold in the UK, according to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT). Hybrids still outsell them slightly, but the gap is closing fast.

Policy and Pressure

The UK government plans to ban new petrol and diesel cars by 2035, though hybrids will hang around a little longer. ULEZ expansions, congestion charges, and road tax exemptions are nudging drivers towards electric. It’s not just environmental pressure anymore — it’s economic.


How Hybrids Really Work (And Why That’s Not Always A Good Thing)

Hybrids were once the clever compromise — the green car for people not ready to go full electric. In practice, they’ve become a bit of a smoke screen.

The Split Personality Problem

A hybrid is two cars fighting over one steering wheel. It’s got a petrol engine and a battery-powered motor. That means extra weight, extra complexity, and less efficiency than you’d think. Hybrids perform best in stop-start traffic, where the motor handles short bursts. On longer drives, the petrol engine does most of the work.

Plug-in Hybrids and the “Fake Green” Effect

Plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) were meant to be the bridge to full electrics. But a 2023 report by Transport & Environment found that real-world emissions from plug-in hybrids are up to three times higher than official figures because most owners rarely plug them in. The battery often sits unused, and the petrol engine does the heavy lifting.

That means PHEVs can produce more emissions than a regular small petrol car if driven carelessly. Yet they still qualify for green incentives and lower tax rates — a loophole that makes them look greener on paper than they are on the road.

The Battery Burden

Hybrids still rely on mining lithium, nickel, and cobalt for their smaller batteries. They don’t escape the environmental cost of production — they just spread it thinner. Manufacturing two systems (petrol and electric) means double the materials, more waste, and often worse long-term sustainability than a well-used EV.


EVs: Cleaner, Smarter, But Still Imperfect

So yes, EVs have their issues. But on balance, they’re the cleaner, more future-proof choice — if used properly.

Zero Emissions? Not Quite

EVs produce no tailpipe emissions, which makes them ideal for cities. But manufacturing the battery can be carbon-heavy. The Carbon Trust estimates that battery production adds roughly 6 tonnes of CO₂ per vehicle, though this is offset after around two years of typical driving in the UK.

Once you’re past that point, EVs come out far ahead. The average EV emits around 50% less lifetime CO₂ than a petrol car, even when powered by the UK’s current electricity mix.

Charging Challenges in 2025

The UK now has around 65,000 public charging points, according to Zapmap — a 45% increase since 2023. But coverage is still patchy. Motorways are improving, but rural areas lag behind. For people in flats or without driveways, home charging isn’t an option, which can make EV ownership frustrating.

Did you know that:
65,000 public charging points across the UK in 2025 — up 45% from 2023.

Battery Recycling and the Rare Mineral Question

Battery recycling is improving fast. Britishvolt’s successor projects and companies like Recyclus and Veolia are building plants to recover up to 95% of key battery materials. The industry isn’t perfect, but it’s maturing faster than most people realise.


The Money Talk: Cost, Longevity, and Maintenance

Money matters as much as morals when buying a car.

Purchase Price vs Running Costs

EVs are still pricey upfront — the average new EV in the UK costs about £10,000 more than a petrol equivalent. But lower fuel and maintenance costs close the gap. Charging an EV at home can cost just 7–10p per mile, compared with roughly 18–20p for petrol.

Battery Lifespan and Replacement

Early fears about battery degradation are fading. Most modern EVs retain over 90% of their battery capacity after eight years, and manufacturers now offer long warranties — some up to 160,000 miles. Battery replacements are rare and dropping in cost.

Servicing and Repairs

EVs have fewer moving parts — no oil changes, no spark plugs, no exhaust system. Routine maintenance is far cheaper. But when something big goes wrong, repairs can be expensive due to specialised parts and training.


Real-World Driving: Who Wins Where

This is where the choice really depends on your lifestyle.

The City Driver’s Game

If you live in a city, an EV makes absolute sense. Daily mileage is low, charging is easier, and you avoid ULEZ charges. A Nissan Leaf or a Kia e-Niro is more than enough for 95% of urban commutes.

The Motorway Commuter’s Dilemma

For long-distance drivers, hybrids still make sense — but only if you don’t have reliable charging stops. A Toyota Corolla or Honda CR-V hybrid can handle motorway hauls with fewer stops and no range anxiety. But as charging networks expand, this advantage is shrinking fast.

Cold Weather, Heavy Loads, and Other Realities

EVs do lose range in cold weather — sometimes by 20–30% — and towing or carrying heavy loads drains the battery faster. Hybrids handle these conditions better, but you pay for it with emissions.


The Sustainability Smokescreen

Here’s where we need to get brutally honest.

Are Hybrids Just a Delay Tactic?

Many experts believe hybrids were always meant as a stopgap. They let carmakers meet emission targets without committing to full electrification. Some argue that continuing to sell hybrids just delays the inevitable switch.

The Hidden Cost of Going Electric

EVs still depend on fossil fuels during production, and much of the UK’s grid is powered by gas. But as renewable energy grows — now supplying around 45% of Britain’s electricity — EVs keep getting cleaner over time, while hybrids remain stuck in their split-fuel past.

What Genuine Sustainability Looks Like

Owning an “eco-friendly” car doesn’t make you green if you replace it every three years. The most sustainable car is one that already exists. True sustainability also means fewer cars on the road, better public transport, and more walkable cities.

Power Stat:
45% of UK electricity now comes from renewable sources — up from 39% in 2022.


Verdict: The Future Belongs to EVs, But We Need to Drive Smarter

So, which is the better choice in 2025? For most British drivers — it’s the EV. It’s cheaper to run, cleaner over its lifetime, and fits perfectly into a future that’s rapidly going electric. Hybrids still make sense for high-mileage drivers or those without charging access, but they’re a transitional phase, not a destination.

The key isn’t just buying an electric car — it’s keeping it longer, charging smart, and supporting better infrastructure. In 2025, choosing between an EV and a hybrid isn’t about being green — it’s about being honest.

The hybrid had its moment. It helped us understand that driving could be cleaner. But now it’s time to move on. The road ahead is electric — we just need to plug in and drive it properly.

Planet Talk

Your iPhone Is NOT Sustainable

Introduction: The Awkward Truth No One Wants to Admit

Last week I was on the Tube, and a woman was loudly berating her mate about single-use plastics. You know the speech: turtles, oceans, microplastics, the whole lot. All the while, she was scrolling on a shiny new iPhone 15 Pro, probably fresh out of the box. I couldn’t help but smirk. We all love to believe we’re saving the planet with reusable cups and tote bags, but here’s the uncomfortable reality: your iPhone is probably one of the most environmentally damaging things you own.

That’s not a popular thing to say. Apple’s marketing team have done a brilliant job making their products look clean, green, and almost morally superior. The truth, though? The smartphone in your pocket is built on the back of mining, massive energy consumption, and a throwaway culture that contradicts every “save the planet” post you’ve ever liked on Instagram.

Let’s talk about why.


The Myth of the “Eco-friendly” iPhone

Apple loves to talk about its “carbon-neutral” products, recycled aluminium cases, and commitment to green energy. It all sounds impressive — but it’s also very selective.

Recycled Aluminium Isn’t Saving the World

Yes, your iPhone’s casing may be made from recycled aluminium. That’s nice. But that accounts for only a small part of the phone’s overall environmental footprint. According to Apple’s own Environmental Progress Report, around 80% of an iPhone’s lifetime carbon emissions come from production — not the casing, not charging it, not even shipping. The energy needed to extract rare earth minerals, process them, and manufacture the chips dwarfs any gains made by recycling a bit of metal.

The Annual Upgrade Trap

Then there’s the issue of constant upgrading. Apple announces a new iPhone every autumn, and we collectively rush to get rid of the perfectly good one we bought last year. That behaviour fuels more mining, more emissions, more production lines roaring into action. Sustainability isn’t just about what something is made of — it’s about how often we replace it. And Apple’s business model depends on us replacing it far too often.


The Dirty Secret Behind Your Screen: Rare Earth Minerals

Crack open an iPhone (not literally, unless you fancy voiding your warranty), and you’ll find more than 30 different elements. That includes gold, tungsten, lithium, cobalt, and rare earth minerals like neodymium. These don’t come from a magical, eco-friendly supply chain.

Cobalt and Child Labour

Around 70% of the world’s cobalt comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Amnesty International has reported multiple times that cobalt mines in the DRC use child labour and have unsafe conditions. Cobalt is what makes your battery work. Without it, no selfies, no Instagram stories. If you think banning plastic straws is the hill to die on, but you’re funding child labour with your battery, something’s off.

Lithium, Gold, and Tin

Lithium mining is another environmental nightmare. It takes around 500,000 gallons of water to produce one tonne of lithium, and much of that happens in arid regions like Chile’s Atacama Desert, where water is already scarce. Gold mining releases toxic waste and mercury into rivers. Tin and tungsten are classified as conflict minerals, often linked to human rights abuses. Every swipe of your screen is powered by this messy global supply chain.

Environmental Devastation in Numbers

A 2023 report from the Global E-waste Monitor estimated that smartphones contribute to more than 50 million tonnes of e-waste every year worldwide. Most of that is not properly recycled — it ends up in landfills or is shipped to developing countries where workers burn components in open pits to recover tiny scraps of metal. The carbon footprint? Making one iPhone emits roughly 70–80 kg of CO₂ before you even touch it. Multiply that by the 225 million iPhones Apple sold in 2023, and you’ve got the emissions of a small country.


The Carbon Footprint No One Likes to Talk About

Apple proudly tells you their offices run on renewable energy. Great — but your phone’s biggest environmental impact isn’t in the Apple Park solar panels.

Manufacturing Is the Real Culprit

Most iPhones are built in vast Chinese factories that consume enormous amounts of electricity, much of it from coal. Even with some solar and wind thrown into the mix, the sheer scale of production wipes out most of those “green” bragging rights. According to Apple’s own data, manufacturing accounts for four-fifths of total iPhone emissions.

Power-Hungry Data Centres

Think about iCloud. Every time you back up your photos or stream Apple Music, a data centre somewhere is guzzling electricity to keep that going 24/7. These facilities require constant cooling, which burns even more energy. Sure, Apple says it uses renewable energy — but the demand is so relentless that it still strains the grid and indirectly relies on fossil fuels when renewable supply dips.


Repairability: Apple Doesn’t Want You to Fix It

Another big part of sustainability is repairability — and Apple has been dragged into court for how hard it makes fixing its products.

Right to Repair Battles

Independent repair shops have long complained that Apple locks down parts, software, and tools so only authorised centres can fix your phone — often at extortionate prices. If repairing your phone costs nearly as much as a new one, most people just buy new. That’s by design, and it’s wasteful.

What Happens to Old Phones

Those “trade-in” schemes sound responsible, but many old devices are simply recycled for parts or shipped abroad. A significant chunk never make it through proper recycling streams. Mountains of e-waste pile up in Ghana, India, and China, where informal workers, often children, dismantle them with bare hands. If we cared about the planet as much as we say we do, we’d fight harder to stop that.


Hypocrisy Hurts the Cause

And this is the part that stings. It’s not just that iPhones are bad for the planet — it’s that we pretend they aren’t.

Outrage Selectivity

People love to post about saving whales and banning plastic straws while tweeting it from a device that contributes more CO₂ and human suffering than an entire year’s worth of takeaway cups. The selective outrage makes environmentalism look trendy rather than serious.

Why This Matters

If we keep ignoring the elephant in the room — that our love affair with technology is a massive driver of emissions and waste — we weaken the entire argument for sustainability. It becomes performative rather than impactful. True environmentalism means facing uncomfortable truths, and this is one of them.


So, What’s the Solution?

Here’s the good news: there are things we can do. None of them are perfect, but they’re better than pretending the problem doesn’t exist.

Keep Your Phone Longer

The single biggest thing you can do to reduce your tech footprint is simple: stop upgrading every year. Use your phone for four or five years. Replace the battery instead of the whole device. Stretch its life until it actually can’t function.

Support Right to Repair

Push for laws that make phones easier and cheaper to fix. In the EU, new rules are coming in that will require companies to make parts available for longer and allow independent repair shops to operate freely. That’s progress worth supporting.

Be Honest About the Trade-offs

Finally, we need to stop pretending that tech is green. It’s not. It comes with a cost, and we need to be honest about that if we care about the future. The next time someone lectures you about saving the planet while showing you a TikTok on their new iPhone, remind them of the cobalt in their battery and the coal-powered factory that built it.